Is Colors Team Worth $41M, Even if Its Idea Isnt?

The launch of a new mobile app called Color on Wednesday has caused a lot of buzz not so much because of the app itself, but because of the massive sum of money the company raised before it even launched: a group of funds including Sequoia Capital gave the company $41 million, and Sequoias chunk (as Color proudly noted) is more than the fund invested in Google. Is this new app really as revolutionary as that implies? Maybe. But whats more likely is that the VCs involved are betting the team behind Color will come up with something worthwhile for that $41 million, and they dont particularly care what it is.

Color and its supporters claim that the app creates a new kind of paradigm for photo-sharing, in the sense that you share pictures not just with friends or a small group, the way you would with Instagram or Path, but also with people who happen to be in the same place you are which makes it more like Foursquare or a group-messaging app like Beluga than existing photo-sharing services. And the app supposedly learns from your behavior and creates ad-hoc groups based on whom you are interacting with (see Darrells post for a more in-depth look at the apps strengths and flaws).

Do people want to suddenly share photos with random strangers based on the fact that they happen to be at the same club? Thats the bet Color seems to be making. Which as more than one person has observed makes it a little odd that the company didnt launch at SXSW, the giant music and technology festival that just wrapped up in Austin. An app based on something so real-time and social seems almost perfectly matched to that kind of social environment (Colors huge funding round has already sparked a number of satirical takes on the app).

Sequoia said on Twitter that a company like Color comes along once or twice in a decade, and thats why it decided to give the startup more money than it ever has to a pre-launch company (venture investor Eghosa Omogui says the funding implies a post-money valuation that is likely north of $100 million). But Sequoia is likely talking more about the team involved than the app itself, since the company is headed up by Bill Nguyen who sold his music-sharing service LaLa to Apple in late 2009 and includes Peter Pham, founder of BillShrink, as well as former LinkedIn chief scientist DJ Patil.

Is betting that kind of money on a team, regardless of their idea, a good bet to make? Some would argue that it is. In a recent blog post, Union Square Ventures partner Fred Wilson wrote about how much he regrets not investing in what became AirBnB he thought the idea was dumb, but the team behind it was clearly motivated and represented all the things he likes to invest in. In other words, the team was more important than the idea they were pushing at the time. (Paul Graham of Y Combinator has posted the email exchange in which he tried to convince Wilson to invest in AirBnB). We missed Airbnb even though we loved the team, Wilson says. Big mistake.

Chris Dixon,! an ange l investor and co-founder of Hunch.com, made a similar point in a recent blog post about Dropbox. Dixon says that when he first encountered the company, he thought it was a copycat file-sharing service just like hundreds of others that had been launched around the same time, and he figured its chances of success were slim to nil. Later, the company raised money (from Sequoia, coincidentally) and Dixon says he eventually realized that the team was what was important, not the idea.

I think the only way they could have made that decision was by ignoring the space, competitors, etc. and simply investing in a super talented person/team. Dropbox is one reason I now have a strict rule to only invest in teams you should always invest in people over ideas.

So will Nguyen and the rest of the star team behind Color manage to do something that is worth all of that investment? Thats the $41-million question. One thing is for sure another photo-sharing app, regardless of its unusual features, probably isnt going to cut it. And its probably worth mentioning that the Valley is littered with the skeletons of high-profile startups that launched with big ambitions and lots of money.

Post and thumbnail photos courtesy of Flickr user Julian Fong

Related content from GigaOM Pro (subscription reqd):


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

China Watch: Magical New Maglev, Fire the Ambassador?

Live Blog: GMIC G-Startup Competition 2011

Chinese Pinterest Huaban.com Grabs Money and Attention